International Journal of Phonosurgery & Laryngology

Register      Login

VOLUME 5 , ISSUE 2 ( July-December, 2015 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Estimation of Spectral Amplitude Measures in Healthy Aged Individuals

Radish Kumar Balasubramanium, Dhanya Monnappa

Citation Information : Balasubramanium RK, Monnappa D. Estimation of Spectral Amplitude Measures in Healthy Aged Individuals. Int J Phonosurg Laryngol 2015; 5 (2):42-47.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10023-1103

Published Online: 00-12-2015

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2015; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Introduction

The anatomical and physiological changes in the phonatory system due to aging have a major impact on voice. Widely researched parameters of voice like fundamental frequency and the perturbation measures have strong correlation with age. However, these measures depend on the location of the exact pitch pulses and it may yield unreliable results in case of a severely aperiodic voice. Also, harmonic measures of voice in healthy aging are scanty in the literature.

Aim

The present study focused on determining the changes in harmonic-related measures in healthy aging individuals using spectral amplitude measures.

Materials and methods

The participants were classified into three groups as young, middle-aged, and elderly adults based on their age. All the participants were required to sustain three different types of vowels. Voice samples were analyzed using CSL software to obtain the spectral amplitude measures.

Results

This showed that there was a decrease in spectral amplitude measures with aging.

Discussion

Thus, suggesting that the harmonic structure of voice is not affected in healthy aged individuals. Vowel type and gender also influences the harmonic-related measures in the healthy aging population.

Conclusion

The results of the present study could be used by the voice clinicians while assessing adults with voice disorders. It will also help the clinicians in delineating the age and gender differences in the vocal parameters.

How to cite this article

Monnappa D, Balasubramanium RK. Estimation of Spectral Amplitude Measures in Healthy Aged Individuals. Int J Phonosurg Laryngol 2015;5(2):42-47.


PDF Share
  1. Aging thyroarytenoid and limb skeletal muscle: lessons in contrast. J Voice 2008; 22(4):430-450.
  2. Ossification of the laryngeal cartilages as it relates to computed tomography. Invest Radiol 1982;17(1):11-19.
  3. Anatomy and physiology of the larynx. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2006 Feb;39(1):1-10.
  4. Histopathologic changes in the aging human cricoarytenoid joint. The Laryngoscope 1994; 104(5):533-538.
  5. Formant frequency structure of the aging male and femal vocal tract. Folia Phoniatrica 1990; 42(6):312-319.
  6. Acoustic measurement of geriatric voice. J Laryngol Voice 2012;2(2): 81-84.
  7. Voice spectrograms as a function of age, voice disguise, and voice imitation. J Acous Soc Am 1971;49(6):1842-1848.
  8. Comparison of postmenopausal voice changes across professional and nonprofessional users of the voice. South African J Communication Disorder 2010; 57(1):76-81.
  9. Vocal aging. Australia: Singular Thomson Learning; 2001.
  10. Effects of aging on selected acoustic voice parameters: preliminary normative data and educational implications. Educational Gerontol 2001;27(2):159-168.
  11. A methodological study of perturbation and additive noise in synthetically generated voice signals. J Speech Hearing Res 1987;30(4):448-461.
  12. Comparing reliability of perceptual and acoustic measures of voice. J Speech Hearing Res 1995;38(1):26-32.
  13. Glottal characteristics of female speakers: acoustic correlates. J Acous Soc Am 1997;101(1):466-481.
  14. Vowel harmonic amplitude differences in persons with vocal nodules. J Voice 2011;25(5):559-561.
  15. Glottal characteristics of male speakers: acoustic correlates and comparison with female data. J Acous Soc Am 1999;106(2):1064-1077.
  16. Glottal air.ow and transglottal air pressure measurements for male and female speakers in soft, normal and loud voice. J Acous Soc Am 1988;84(2):511-529.
  17. Analysis, synthesis, and perception of voice quality variations among female and male talkers. J Acous Soc Am 1990;87(2):820-857.
  18. The relationship between cepstral peak prominence and selected parameters of dysphonia. J Voice 2002;16(1):20-27.
  19. A cepstrum-based technique for determining a harmonic-to-noise ratio in speech signals. J Speech Hearing Res 1993;36(2):254-266.
  20. The effect of hormones on the voice. J Singing 2013;69(5):571-574.
  21. Anatomic and physiologic changes in the aging peripheral speech mechanism. In: Beasley DS, Davis GA, editors. Aging: Communication processes and disorders. New York: Grune and Stratton; 1981.
  22. Effects of physiological aging on selected acoustic characteristics of voice. J Speech Hearing Res 1983;26(1):22-30.
  23. Acoustic-perceptual correlates of voice quality in elderly men and women. J Communication Disorders 2006;39(3):171-184.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.